Asking questions to establish prior knowledge

 

By starting your lesson with some questions to students, you can probe to establish what students already know about the topic that you plan to cover and adjust your teaching in the lesson accordingly. Alternatively, you could end a lesson with questions to students which will help you determine the content and level of the following lesson; this way you will have more time to prepare and adjust your lesson in accordance with the students’ prior knowledge.

 

Asking different types of questions gives you a chance to check the depth of your students’ understanding of a topic. A useful tool for defining questions is Bloom’s taxonomy (Bloom, 1984), in which questions are categorised according to various levels of abstraction typically investigated during academic studies.

 

 

Blooms Taxonomy

 

The various types of questions that we use with our students can be categorized in many ways, but probably the most often cited taxonomy is Blooms. Bloom based his taxonomy on the types of tasks most often called for in academic settings.

 

 1. Knowledge Questions: recall and recognition: major ideas, dates, names, places, etc.

 

  • Key words: Who, what, where, when, define, describe, select, identify, tell, choose, match, which one, omit, etc.

 

 2. Comprehension Questions: understanding, interpreting facts, translating knowledge, comparing and contrasting

 

·         Key words: summarize, contrast, explain, predict, state in your own words, demonstrate, discuss, show, give an example, select the best definition, which statements support, infer, etc.

 

 3. Application Questions: use information, solve problems, apply information to new situations

 

·         Key words: Calculate, illustrate, show, relate, what would result, modify, judge the effects, tell what would happen, complete, discover, examine, etc.

 

4. Analysis Questions: finding patterns, parts, organization, components

 

·         Key words: Identify, analyze, connect, classify, arrange, order, what does the author believe or assume, find the inconsistencies, separate, compare, what conclusions, separate fact and opinion, etc.

 5. Synthesis Questions: creating new ideas from old ones, generalizing from facts, relating elements or knowledge in a new way, predicting, drawing conclusions

 

·         Key words: Combine, develop, choose, state a rule, solve the following, plan, formulate, rearrange, compose, modify, generalize, propose an alternative, etc.

 

 6. Evaluation Questions: discriminating between ideas, making choices and defending them, assessing the value of theories, verifying the value of the evidence, identifying subjectivity

·         Key words: Assess, criticize, judge, recommend, convince, appraise, what fallacies/inconsistencies appear, what is more logical/better/appropriate/moral, rank, support, grade, summarize, measure, discriminate, etc. 

 

table adapted from Ross (2007)

 

 

To find out the scope of the students’ knowledge and understanding, it helps to ask questions from a variety of levels. Ross (2007) makes some recommendations to teachers who opt to use the questioning approach:

 

·         Allow sufficient time for students to answer questions: the more complex the question, the more time should be given.

·         If the students don’t come up with an answer, don’t answer it yourself, but rephrase the question. To help students increase their confidence in their responses, they can be asked to discuss the question in pairs or small groups first.  Teachers should give the message that it is up to them to answer the questions.

·         Avoid asking the students if they have any questions. Teachers are more likely to discover what the students know and understand if the students are set the task of listing their own questions or asked specific questions by the teacher about the topic to be covered.

·         Choose questions to the students that fit in with the learning goals for the course or lesson and help them to see the connections to what they already know.

 

 

 

 

 

References:

Bloom BS. 1984. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.

Ross C. 2007. Handbook for Teaching Assistants. Institute for Teaching and Learning. University of Connecticut, Connecticut. http://www.tap.uconn.edu/downloads/TA%20HandbookRev6%2007.pdf  (Accessed 27.5.2008)

University of Victoria Counselling Services. http://www.coun.uvic.ca/learning/exams/blooms-taxonomy.html (Accessed 27.5.2008)

 

 

 

 

Suzy McAnsh, Language Centre, University of Oulu